April 23, 2014 | Rome, Italy | Clear 15°C

Leonardo's passion


John, Giovanni, is to Jesus' right (left from the viewer's perspective), and appears to swoon.
By Mark Campbell
Published: 2014-04-22
I

have lived in Milan for more than 10 years and until a week ago I'd never seen Il cenacolo, "The Last Supper," Leonardo da Vinci 15th-century Renaissance masterpiece. What's worse, even though I pass the church of Santa Maria delle Grazie every Friday afternoon, I'd never even tried to get a ticket.

I told myself it was because I hate lines and crowds, or that I'd seen pictures of it in books and I didn't want to be disappointed by the real thing. I also worried that the underlying reason might be that I'm just lazy and uncultured.

The other evening my friend Luisa invited Alberto and I to a private viewing of the painting paid for by a pharmaceutical company. There were only 15 of us, along with two guides, and we pretty much had unlimited time to take it in. It was the opportunity I'd been waiting for and I must say it was splendid.

I am neither an expert nor art critic. But three things struck me in particular:

The first was the painting's sense of perspective. It really does appear to be a portal into a room of its own. Second, Leonardo's composition is such that the figures gathered around the table create a kind of perfectly balanced pyramid or triangle that appears natural and not contrived. Finally, there's an overwhelming feeling that the scene is animated, alive.

Leonardo's success in portraying the scene isn't just technical. He transmits his own passion, and as a result the passion the characters have for one another.


La Giaconda, or the Mona Lisa: Whose eyes do you see?

Particularly notable is the figure of John, Giovanni, who is seated to the right of Jesus in the painting and appears curiously feminine. Many of us are familiar with novelist Dan Brown's notion that John represents Maria Magdalena, the wife of Jesus. While a good conspiracy theory is fun, I'm not convinced that Leonardo, living more than 1,400 years after Christ and thousands of miles away from the Holy Land, would have had any special insight into whether Jesus was married.

I asked our guide about John's womanly appearance and she explained that Renascence painters commonly depicted adolescent males with feminine qualities. Good explanation, but it felt somehow too simplistic. Above all, art is communication, and I still didn't understand what Leonardo was trying to say.

John was the disciple who Jesus "loved best," and thus Leonardo was charged with the task of expressing that love. A number of biographers have argued Leonardo was homosexual. If so, he would have understood love between two men through the eyes and desire of a homosexual man. Still, I don't think that Leonardo had any secret knowledge about the sex life of Jesus or intended to suggest that Jesus was a homosexual.

What he needed to do in the painting was communicate love between John and Jesus in a way that all could find accessible and understand. He accomplished this by transcending male and female representation and separation between homosexual and heterosexual desire. Thus John, a young male, has highly ambiguous female attributes, enabling Leonardo to breathe his understanding of passion into his depictions of both John and Christ, while at the same time conveying that passion to viewers on a very basic level.

A few days after we saw the painting, my friend Luisa and I looked at a print of La Giocanda, the Mona Lisa, thought to be a portrait of Lisa Gherardini, the wife of Francesco del Giacondo. I've heard theories that the Mona Lisa is actually a Leonardo self-portrait. The eyes could be those of a man, at least to me, but Luisa said it was just lack of mascara or eye shadow. We both agreed that her mouth could be a man's.

Again Leonardo appeared to have transcended the boundary between masculine and feminine beauty and possibly between hetero and homosexual desire. Perhaps it's this ambiguity, or even irony, that's makes Mona Lisa's smile so indefinably alluring.

Print | Email | | | 1

PARENTHOOD

Kissy Dugan

Waking the dead

Trying to explain mortality is a major hurdle all parents must eventually face.

Downloading iKids

Putting limit your kids' video time can sometimes seem like an exercise in futility.

Monsters under the bed

Talking about sex to your growing kids isn't a matter of being in the mood, it's a parental must


LOST IN TRANSLATION

Jennifer Allison

Expletive kisses

Lips can make you feel excited, overwhelmed, empty, loved, surprised, and disappointed.

Virtual flowers

Sure, it's the thought that counts, but text thoughts rarely smell like roses.


L-WORD

Annie Gold

Consummation of convenience

Getting errands done for you on a cold night can unexpectedly turn up the heat.

"I can't wait..."

Sometimes, three dots can be the beginning of something deeper than sweet.


THE FARM

Lucy Brignall

Food for thought

The prospect of massive-sized farms in the UK, the norm in the U.S, comes with risks.

Little big thing

Small ideas can eventually have a major impact on life, but the road is often long.


WONDERLAND

Julianne VanWagenen

Sans le fear

Therapy is an American East Coast staple, but why it matters, and if it matters, is a tougher question.

Dark matters still

The sudden death of someone you love can produce worldly shock waves.


THAT'S QUEER

Mark Campbell

Leonardo's passion

How you see masterpieces can depend on emotional and sexual perspective.

Head in the sand

Too often, it is fathers who let their children down when it comes to LGBT understanding.


FUORI MAPPA

Barbara Tarricone

Elbow-to-elbow

A Bologna penitentiary program is opening the door to women inmates.

Homeless Street blues

Homeless Italians must reacquire residency, a daunting prospect, but there's help.


2ND GENERATION

Alexandra Bruzzese

The globalization of Alexandra

As American friends dwindle, new cultural influences intervene to inform.


LIVING ARCHIVE


Everything you need to know about visiting or moving to Tuscany, Italy.